Saturday, July 2, 2011

Five: Porridge, 1940s Style


My grandfather, Basil Edward Pease Gregg, was a quaker, who after retirement following the Second World War volunteered to work for the Prison Aid Committee in London. In the years between the war and his  death in 1958, he met with hundreds of prisoners (leaving behind him diaries full of illegible scribbles about each individual he met). Asked by the Portfolio Society to speak about something of interest to him -- it was a Quaker organization, so one spoke about whatever one was moved to talk about -- he decided he would provide his fellow society members with insight into the criminals he encountered. The speech is a lively (and tongue-in-cheek) account from someone who was sympathetic to the pathetic plight of the many people who had been thrust into prison for minor offenses, and who, in many cases, should have been dealt with in other ways. It gives you a flavor of the mindset of the middle class in the 1940s, and some of the changes that were then occurring as London society emerged from the years of rationing and privation brought on by the war.

Here is the speech:


ALL SORTS AND CONDITIONS OF MEN

When I received my invitation card to this meeting of the Portfolio Society & saw that the Secretary had three times underlined the word “Essay”, I realised that this obligation could no longer be evaded & that something would, at last, have to be done about it.
But what to write about? I had not the slightest idea. Like many another victim before me, I spent fruitless hours biting the end of my pen and groping in my mind for incidents in bygone holidays; books I had read; plays I had seen – anything, in fact, around which some sort of essay might be written. But all to no purpose; ideas would not present themselves & I was becoming pretty desperate.
Then, suddenly, I remembered that, as Chairman of a Prison Aid Committee some days previously, a case had come before me of a man who, inadvertently, had found himself in prison on a charge of, “receiving” some paltry article, “knowing it to have been stolen,” as the wording of the charge runs. The man was technically guilty; but obviously a decent if stupid citizen and morally innocent; and it seemed particularly hard lines that he should have his fingerprints taken and be cast into gaol. Yes, I pondered, in these difficult days of multi-regulations any law-abiding citizen, even, yes, even a member of the Portfolio Society, might wake up one morning and find himself in a cell with a number instead of a name.
This of course it was beyond me to prevent: but, at least, it seemed a moral duty to warn Members of the various kinds of fellow travellers with whom they would journey, in case, just in case, the worst happens.
I hasten to say that the foregoing remarks do not of course apply to the lady Members, whom one simply daren’t think of ever being in such a predicament advertently (if there is such a word) or inadvertently.
When this hobby of Prison Visiting intrigued me twelve years ago, it took me some little time to sort out in a rough and ready way the various types of prisoners which the Prison housed. For, during this period, every kind of wrongdoer has come my way – forgers, confidence tricksters, card sharpers, burglars, safe breakers, false pretence specialists, armed gangsters, etc., etc., together with all the less serious offenders such as habitual drunkards, beggars, pickpockets, & so on.
This particular prison is termed a Local Prison & houses all the foregoing if their sentences are for less than three years. Men serving over three years go to a convict establishment.
The largest class is composed of social mis-fits, men who for one reason or another seem unable to lead normal lives & who easily slip into some form of crime, many ending up as habitual criminals. A number in this category are, as may be supposed, not quite mentally stable, although sufficiently so to become a nuisance to Society.
For example there is A, now a man of 55, with some twenty previous convictions, who comes from a good family &, in his day, has held managerial positions in the City. His especial weakness is for what he calls “having a good time” in the West End, although he knows perfectly well that his escapades must inevitably end the same way. When last discharged form prison, he went straight to the Admiralty &, incredible as it may seem, persuaded a clerk to give him an order on a Naval outfitter for a Captain’s uniform, saying he was Captain Blank of HMS Blank. At last, fully rigged out and resplendent with rows of medal ribbons, he drove up to a luxury hotel – all on the small cash allowance which the Aid Committee had granted him – and took a suite for a week.  All went well from his point of view and he lived like a lord until the account was presented at the end of the week, when he calmly told the manager he hadn’t a penny, but had had a good time, “Thank you!”
Then there is B, a man of 40, whose relatives are high-ups in the Legal world. His downfall was due to a position he had as Advisor to an Eastern potentate at a princely salary. He told me that his duties were negligible, but drink was plentiful; & the advice he gave to the potentate could therefore not be relied upon. His relatives have spent thousands of pounds in trying to get him on his fee, but he simply refuses to cooperate, and to date has been in & out of prison over thirty times for theft & false pretence offences. Not long ago, two days after his release, he obtained some jewelry by a trick from a Bond Street jeweler, and that same night dined as a guest at an exclusive regimental mess. Next morning he was rounded up as usual. I know this man well and he has charming manners & is an entertaining raconteur; & it is sad to see a man of his ability & education slip steadily down into the abyss of crime. Nothing can be done for him, and he will end up in a convict prison as an incorrigible rogue.
My second class consists of men who have definite criminal instincts resulting, it may be, from hereditary causes, or bad home influence & who deliberately take to crime as affording if a precarious livelihood yet a degree of excitement in pitting their wits against the police.
In this class you have the extremely clever professional burglar who raids West End flats & country houses. He lays his plans with the utmost care & exhaustive preparation & is rarely caught, although Scotland Yard’s latest counter measures are making life more difficult for him. I have only met one of these aristocrats of crime;m & it was interesting to see how the smaller fry of the burglar fraternity looked up to him. It is unlikely therefore that Members of the Society will have the honour of meeting him.
I think that the most un-moral man I ever met – who should also be included in this class – was both a confidence trickster & also an expert card sharper, despite a semi-paralysed right hand. One quickly sensed that he was utterly merciless & quite without a vestige of conscience for his victims. His method was to work the Atlantic liners with a confederate; & his plans would be made & his intending victims marked down perhaps months before he got to work. Happily, however, this form of crime is now dying out, as criminals of to-day prefer quicker, if smaller, returns.
The exciting side of crime, which I mentioned just now, is well typified by another friend of mine who, with his wife (who always works with him) are a pair of expert burglars. Some months ago they burgled a West End flat & got away with some thousands of pounds worth of valuables. Next day, in the early editions of the evening papers, was printed, with an account of the burglary, an interview with the victim – a titled lady. In telling her story, she foolishly mentioned that, fortunately, the burglars overlooked the most valuable pieces of jewellery in the wardrobe of an adjoining room. That very night the couple returned to the flat & tookethat also!
Or take the bravado of a man in the less skilled class who stole books from the outside of a bookshop in Charing Cross Road & then sold them to the proprietor of the same shop inside.
Since the war a dangerous type of young criminal has emerged in the shape of the deserter on the run. He has no ration book & has thus to thieve to live, & many of them are armed. Last year, one of these lads was caught within a quarter of a mile of this house, having shot a policemen in trying to escape. He & I got to know one another well & I found that his widowed mother was a Quaker; & before the war he himself sometimes attended Meeting at his home in the Midlands.
I put the sexual offender in my third classification. He forms a big percentage of the inmates of this prison & is a source of frustration to me. One need be no psychologist to realize that the majority of these cases at any rate should never come to prison at all but be treated in some institution specially designed for them. As it is, the same men return to prison month after month & year after year; & prison life and discipline have no deterrent effect on them whatever. On the contrary, it is definitely harmful bot the themselves & their fellow prisoners, especially in these days of overcrowding in prisons. The problem is an urgent one, but hedged around with difficulties. But so far as I can see no real attempt is being made to solve it.
I am coming to the end of my paper & thus cannot tell you of several other interesting inmates, some of whom you might well be fortunate enough to meet.
Old K, for instance, who has some 120 convictions to his debit, all for travelling on the railway without paying his fare. He is no criminal, but has all the Englishman’s passion for adventure & discovery. He knows his England better than any one of us here; & every time he returns for a spell of rest from his wanderings, it is always a matter of eager speculation what part of the British Isles he has been to this time. The stories he can tell you!
Then ther is old Bill Sykes, a superannuated burglar, whose hand has lost its cunning & who cannot keep pace with modern methods of burglary, getting caught almost before he brings out his j[e]mmy. No, the days when the burglar literally banged his way into a house are gone. Instead, you have the silent thief, armed with little more than a piece of celluloid to force back your Yale lock. He is always full of grumbles, this old lag. Some other prisoner will slip into his cell in his absence & borrow his Library book. “Disgraceful,” he grumbles, “stealing me books. I don’t know what this place is coming to.”
In the next cell is young R an expert safe breaker who is reputed to be able to open any make of sage inside 20 minutes. He specialises in hotels on the South coast & the police give a sigh of relief when he is safely under lock & key. He has brains & education which would earn him a good living; but that way of life would be too humdrum for him & he seems to prefer something which will bring more excitement. However, I still have hope that some day he will realise the folly of it all & try to run level, especially as I gather that there is a decent girl to whom he seems devoted & who has promised to marry him when he turns over a new leaf.
There is just this little story & I have finished. By dint of much patience & by picking up bits of wire & empty tobacco tin when the warders weren’t looking, a somewhat tough friend of mine ingeniously constructed a miniature wireless receiver. It all had to be done very secretly & took him several weeks to complete. At last the great day came & he got into bed early & buried the receiver under his blankets from the prying eyes of the patrolling warder. Would it work? A moment of agonizing suspense! Yes, it actually did; but instead of the robust humour of Tommy Handley, “Much Binding In the Marsh,” & all the variety of favourites for whom his soul yearned, all he could get was a thin rendering of a symphony of Shostakovic, from the 3rd Programme! His disgust was complete!

   ------------------------------------------------------------------
Many members probably had the good fortune to see a remarkable sunset in the latter part of September, one of the most beautiful I can ever remember. It happened that I had gone up to the Prison to say goodbye to a lad of 24, who was to be removed next day to a convict prison to serve a sentence of 15 years for an abominable crime. As we were talking the cell became illumined by the marvelous mixture of saffron, pink & dark blue; & despite prison regulations, we climbed up to the narrow barred window the better to see it. In silent awe we gazed at this beautiful phenomenon until it gradually faded out.
Then he turned to me & said quietly, “That was beautiful. I have never seen anything like it before.” Then, after a pause, he added, “You know I think the trouble with us chaps inside is that we have never learnt to look up.”
Yes, I thought, you are probably right; & that goes for a lot of us chaps, as well.

Friday, July 1, 2011

Four: Theses on the Philosophy of History

after Walter Benjamin (2003)

I

Let me move my pieces,
or let my god do it for me,
a Deep Junior or Kasparov
hidden inside the chess board –
theology and theocracy,
teleology and technocracy,
all in the service of history.

Let the people of the East
see my puppet in Turkish attire
move their pieces towards democracy,
while I lubricate the machinery
of government and prophet
for profit.


II

Weak Messianism nurtures our love for history;
all paths lead to the present,
and the future will lead there too.

We are the world
of past, present, and future.

The earth waited for our coming,
nurturing meaning;
it waits for our actions,
expectantly;
it sees our becoming,
and our fulfillment;
and whether it survives
or ends its revolving,
burning up amidst greenhouse gasses,
and other human excretions,
it will be fulfilled.

Such at least is the history.

Our image of happiness
is bound up with the image of redemption.
and our past is the path towards that redemption,
our autobiography –
mere hagiography.


III

A chronicler once foretold
that pigeons would nest in Trafalgar Square.

Amidst the memories of battles won
and the circus of a traffic jam,
the strangled roads of Tottenham’s courts,
and the strands of Victoriana
hanging from a marbled arch,
we will see gray, white, and black pigeons,
leaving their mark on historic pavement.

And on what day will we distinguish
among these things:
Nelson, Victoria, the British Museum –
all those past glories –
and these markings of flying rodents?

Assigning meaning is for Judgment Day,
though we will signify meanings
and other bird droppings,
in the meantime.


IV

Seek for food and clothing first, then
the Kingdom of God shall be added unto you.
– Hegel , 1807

Gods are born not in empty bellies,
though there they may gain some sustenance;
they are born in the knowledge of the full stomach,
in the satisfaction of material wants.

Gods provide for the starving,
opiates opine for the mind,
but this is all mere chiliasm,
despairing of all hope for material well-being,
unless the gods can make their own marks,
whereby a record or archive is constructed
in their memories.

Such gods are then real;
such gods are meaningful;
such gods are to be listened to,
are to be reckoned with,
in the course of human affairs,
in the house of human conflict.

Courage, humor, cunning and fortitude
will be manifest in their struggle.
Once recognized,
they will question every victory,
past and present,
of the rulers
– and their other gods.

As flowers turn towards the sun
by dint of secret heliotropism,
the past strives to turn toward a star
rising in the sky of history.

But which flowers will we see?


V

True history flits by.

The past can be seized
only as an image
which flashes up at the instant it is seen,
never to be seen again.

It is a photograph
captured on paper
but printed in invisible inks.

The historian opens her mouth
and the meaning of the ages
the preening of the sages
gets lost within her exhalation.

The listener turns back to his morning newspaper,
sips at a cup of coffee
and examines the morning crossword,
the mourning cross words,
and puzzled revelations.


VI

“What it really was,”
says Ranke,
“is the one thing needful.”

“If it really was,”
says the materialist,
“is the one thing doubtful.”

Danger will bring forth historic fact;
it will be there,
but invisible
without anxiety.

The need for the fact
will give it life,
and the fact will be needed
when the historian,
lying on an analyst’s chair
reaches for the causes
of his inner concern
his fear of conflict,
his search for community,
his yearning for some continuity.

Historian and historical agents
stand in awe of that danger,
fight for its narrative outlines
while staking claims for objectivity.

And who will win?

The historian will believe in eternal justice,
that he represents a Messiah,
that he is subduing an Antichrist,
and that he is losing.

Even the dead will not be safe from the enemy
if he should lose.

And, with a McCarthyite’s anxious flourish,
he notes that the enemy has never ceased
to be victorious.


VII
Consider the darkness and the great cold
In this vale which resounds with mystery.
                        – Brecht, The Threepenny Opera

Blot out the present
to reach the past,
so sayeth Fustel de Coulanges.

We must be sad
to resuscitate Carthage,
so sayeth Flaubert.

But with whom shall we empathize?

Will it not be the victors,
to whom go all the spoils
of history –
for whom we must spoil history.

Are we not surrounded by the inheritors:
the triumphal procession
of present rulers
stepping over those who are lying prostrate –
not even their victims,
but the unconsidered losers,
the eternally mysterious?

But there is no document of civilization
that is not at the same time
a document of barbarism,
and barbarism will taint,
will have a hold on
the transmitter – the historian.

And to free herself from barbarism
is a task of disassociation,
brushing history against the grain
and not for gain.


VIII

We live in a “state of emergency”
and we are taught that this is the exception
not the rule.
We got here through 9/11
when we could have been somewhere else
mere descendants from a Good War,
or a mistaken one,
continuing to live in the lap of luxury
without a care,
lapping up our innocence.

But the innocent sojourning
in the state of emergency
is fearful indeed!

What would a real state of emergency
look like,
when emergency is not considered emergency
but more of the same
in world historical terms?

Would it be the hungry finding food
and the shackled passing into freedom?

For, surely it will not be another despotic act,
another terroristic response?
as these are age old and tired metaphors
for emergency!


IX
My wing is ready for flight,
I would like to turn back,
If I stayed timeless time,
I would have little luck.
                        --Gerhard Scholem, “Gruss vom Angelus”

The people look skyward
seeking aid from above,
and the Angel of History
appears on the horizon
his eyes staring, mouth open
and wings spread,
while human catastrophes
are hurled before his feet.

He would stay to help,
but a storm is blowing from paradise
and a violent gust
propels him into the future
while past and present erupt
behind and beneath him.

This is what we call progress.


X

The themes of monastic discipline,
those vows of chastity and poverty,
on which the monk must ponder for an eternity
in life and death,
are the principles of his disengagement
from the world
in life and death.

So too our politicians’ faith
in our progress
(the movement toward a goal
in life and beyond death),
in their “mass basis”
(the chads falling to the floor
in a pile of unregistered opinion),
and in their servile integration
into an uncontrollable apparatus
(the rampant, warlike state),
shall be our principles of disengagement
in life and others’ death.

There is a much higher price to pay
for a conception of history
that will free us from complicity,


XI

Conformity and Social Democracy
tie worker to the shop-floor
in manufactories of self-exploitation
and self-negation.

Technological developments
bring bounties to mankind,
and these can be consumed
for the benefit of all.

Such at least is the glory
of the Stalinist five year plan.

In such a world the fantastic
becomes the norm
and common sense is subject
to ridicule.

Fourier’s four moons
can illuminate the earthly night;
and cooperation can help nature
to free the human spirit
of its gas guzzling
consumption of mineral deposits.

Exploiting nature
cannot deliver her of the creations
that lie dormant within her womb,
as potential,
when such potential is almost spent.


XII
            We need history, but not the way the spoiled loafer
in the garden of knowledge needs it.
                        – Nietzsche, Of the Use and Abuse of History

Neither man nor men,
woman nor women
can be the depository
of human knowledge;
it is the non-man, non-woman,
the alien, the oppressed.

But the search for respectability,
acceptance as man and woman,
ends the search for knowledge.

We end up nourished by images
of enslaved ancestors,
searching for recourse
in reparations,
rather than those
of liberated grandchildren.

But when the world
is reduced to a pie –
pi-r-squared –
why not demand a bigger slice?

Let freedom become enslavement.


XIII
            Every day our cause becomes clearer and people get smarter.
                                    – Wilhelm Dietzgen, Die Religion der Socialdemokratie

Smart people,
Smart bombs,
Smarting people.


XIV
            Origin is our goal.
                        – Karl Kraus, Worte in Versen, vol. 1

And in our end, our purpose,
We shall find our beginning.

Robespierre’s origin was ancien Rome,
a past charged with the time of the now,
catapulted out of the continuum of history
to have present value, and present tense.

Fashion has a flair for the topical;
no matter where it stirs in the thickets
of long ago –
it is the tiger’s leap into the past.
Tiger, burning bright,
responds only to the commands
of the ruling class.

A Blair will yearn for the halcyon days
before Eden;
a Bush will burn for the desire
of a Rooseveltian imperial presidency,
with Raj-like purpose of moral uplift,
proclaimed aloud
amidst only quiet terror.

What will be our dialectic?
What ghosts will we summon up from the past
to be our antithesis,
so that we too can leap
into the open air of history,
forging a synthesis
from shards of broken memories?



XV

We will make time explode;
we will stop history
and get off.

Failing that,
we’ll stop the clocks.


XVI

The fleeting, time-fleecing present,
in which I write,
gives me perspective
that others could not have –
shrouded as they were
in mystery,
behind that veil
of History,
being the losers
and not winners,
like me.

Bah!  We have sung historians
in many cities –
we will sing of the sun.

Sleeping with that whore,
called “Once upon a time”
in historicism’s bordello
is engaging,
but draining.
History as potential
dries up,
locked between the narrative legs
of “Once upon a time.”

But the materialist,
the realist
with his real list,
will remain in control of his faculties;
he will be disciplined
and man enough
to blast through the bordello
to the continuum of history.

Women and eunuchs
will have to remain behind.


XVII

Mustering a mass of data
without theoretical armature,
additive Universal History
subtracts the silences
from the past.

But the historian
of materialistic bent
searches for the oppressed past,
in the fissures
and interstices of the moment;
trying to disrupt the Messianic flow
propelling a specific era
out of the homogeneous course
of history –
as a specific life
or a specific work
out of the lifework.

Preservation of the lifework,
destruction of the lifework,
preservation of history
and its destruction,
the nurturing of a precious
but tasteless seed.


XVIII

In relation to the history of organic life on earth, the paltry fifty millennia of homo sapiens constitute something like two seconds at the close of a twenty-four-hour day.  On this scale, the history of civilized mankind would fill one-fifth of the last second of the last hour.

The present,
that model of Messianic time
comprising the entire history of mankind
in an enormous abridgment,
coincides exactly
with the stature
which the history of mankind
has in the universe.


A

            Only that which has no history is definable.
                                                – Nietzsche

Finding the causal connection
between discrete moments
is the mark of historicism.
But no fact that is a cause
can be historical.
It becomes so
posthumously,
from events
that may be separated from it
by thousands of years.

The present,
“the time of now,”
is shot through
with chips
of Messianic time.


B

Soothsayers
who learn from time
what it has in store,
turn Messianic time
on its head.

We can strip the future
of its magic
by closing down
the futurists,
shutting up shop,
and dealing only in remembrance –
remembering what it is
we can remember,
looking not at ourselves in the mirror,
but at the image of ourselves
looking at a mirror.

That way we can know
that the unexpected
is restricted space,
a zone through which
only a Messiah may enter.

We will grab the past
by the scruff of the neck
and ensure that it conforms to our wish,
that we should only find
what we know has been lost.



*  *  *  *  *

Where are the other seventy-seven theses?

Will these eighteen
shake the foundations
of a church,

bolster a constitution,
or even put a bill to rights?

Where are the other seventy-seven theses?

Were they interrupted
by that self-inflicted wound,
brought on by despair
of escaping from Nazis
only to remain among the fascists?

Were they erased
in the recognition
that even Social Democracy
with all its messy Messianism
might be preferable
to the nihilistic might
of power unbridled,
leading irrevocably
towards its dark conclusions?

If so,
where does that leave us now,
with social democracy eating its own –
its constitution and its rights –
and shaking the foundations
of its own church
in a new crusade?

Perhaps,
like an Owl of Minerva
taking to flight
these missing seventy-five
will come to light
in the dusk
amidst the “shock” projectiles
that herald the arrival
of those legions
from ancien Rome.

Where are the other seventy-seven theses –
now that we need them?